News & Reviews

Windows Vista
Office 2007

Windows Vista

First Impressions
I'm sure you've heard a lot about Vista, possibly not much of it good. I'm running Vista Business here on a Toshiba notebook with an Intel 1.66GHz dual core processor and 2Gb RAM, not exactly the fastest machine around but certainly no slouch.

Most of the time it works just fine. Just occasionally, it seems to go into 'slow' mode; just seems to sit there for 10-15 seconds, then carries on as if nothing was wrong. In the 3 months or so I've been running it, It's locked up on me twice, but bear in mind that it doesn't get treated with a lot of respect. End of the day, and between meetings and all the other non-PC tasks in the day, the lid gets closed and it goes into hibernation. Full Shut Down/Re-boot? Well, that's probably happened about 10 times in the 3 months of use.

Other problems - it's not the most reliable when using it in dual monitor mode, the external monitor dropping out on 3 occasions out of 20-30 presentations I've run. This is a known problem and there is apparently a fix in Service Pack 1. Most of the software I run is Microsoft, so it would be reasonable to assume that would work OK on Vista, and it does. I run the UK version of QuickBooks 2006, and had a problem with that, but a call to Intuit, and they shipped an update to me. QuickBooks still one or two minor glitches, but generally it's fine.

I also run a few odd audio and graphics packages. Audacity, CDEx and The GIMP all seem to run fine, and after downloading an update from the Fuji website, my camera software is running smoothly.

Service Pack 1 is due to be release in the 1st quarter of 2008, and apart from the dual monitor fix mentioned above, seems to be primarily focussed on improvements to the reliability and performance. One thing I'm assured will not be in SP1 is any change to UAC (User Access Control, which stops mere users from installing anything on the PC), despite cries from many Vista adopters.

Office 2007

When I talk about Office 2007 here, I'm talking about the applications sold as Office Professional, i.e. Access, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint and Word. The other applications in the Office family haven't changed in the same way as these. So what are these changes? The major change you'll find is in the user interface, where the menus and toolbars have been replaced in the main by a Ribbon.

To understand why this change was necessary, we have to look at how these applications have changed over the years. Taking Word as an example, Version 1 had a menu with 7 top level items and 50 commands in these menus, plus 2 (fairly sparsely populated) toolbars. Word 2003 had 9 top level items and over 270 commands, plus 31 toolbars and 19 task panes (first introduced in Office 2002).

For people who do the same tasks with the applications day after day this wasn't a problem. The problems surfaced when the requirement was to do something new. Just where in the 270+ commands is the one that's required?

The way that Office 2007 approached this through the Ribbon, is to ensure that any commands that are not appropriate are simply not available, which to me makes total sense. For example, if you are not in a table, why would you need to have the ability to format it?

Each ribbon is selected by a tab, there being just 7 tabs available by default. When circumstances dictate, additional tabs appear, like the Table tab when in a table, or the Picture tab when a picture is selected. The result is a much cleaner, less cluttered, interface.

Having now run over 20 conversion courses, I can confirm that the general response is favourable. On a few occasions I've been asked how to perform a task I've not used before, and in every case it's taken less than 30 seconds to find it. On one occasion I even used the standard trainer's response of 'Where do you think it would be?' with just as quick result.

The apps do seem to freeze for a few seconds sometimes, but how much of this is due to Vista (see the Vista review above) I don't know.

Would I recommend upgrading? Certainly - no question. I now hate having to go back to 2003 and (worse still) 2002 for my day-to-day work.